It's generally the case that the less someone wants to discuss his "scientific" theory, and open it up to objective, documented, reproducible testing, and the more he wants to shove it down everyone's throat without debate, the less actual science there is behind it. We seem to be reaching the point with man-made climate change that we were at when various important and influential people kept insisting that real astronomers from Copernicus to Kepler couldn't possibly be right, and that Ptolemy's epicycles explained planetary retrograde movements, rather than heliocentric, elliptical orbits. It took about 70 years between Copernicus and Kepler to finally nail the epicycle coffin shut, let's hope it takes much less time to bury Glow-bull Wormening.
It's generally the case that the less someone wants to discuss his "scientific" theory, and open it up to objective, documented, reproducible testing, and the more he wants to shove it down everyone's throat without debate, the less actual science there is behind it. We seem to be reaching the point with man-made climate change that we were at when various important and influential people kept insisting that real astronomers from Copernicus to Kepler couldn't possibly be right, and that Ptolemy's epicycles explained planetary retrograde movements, rather than heliocentric, elliptical orbits. It took about 70 years between Copernicus and Kepler to finally nail the epicycle coffin shut, let's hope it takes much less time to bury Glow-bull Wormening.