the dissident frogman

20 years and 8 months ago

The People in the Closet ♠ Les Gens du Placard

the dissident frogman

Necrothreading much?

Article content

Article copy

I know it would take more than a man's life just to record the last 6 months of absolute mendacity and plain putridity (putrid here, putrid there, putrid everywhere) of the French press itself, without actually considering commenting it, and even without looking at the next European door.

But sometimes, the dissident frogman just goes "Duh?!":
Of course it is too early to do more than speculate. But this attack has underlined one thing. It is possible to drive a vehicle, packed with explosives, up to an embassy building in Baghdad.

The Americans say their number one priority is security. The Iraqis say their number one priority is security.

But so far, it is not being provided.
I can understand that Matthew Price, BBC correspondent anywhere can be quite puzzled to discover that all Arabs aren't just a bunch of happy fellows albeit big bad Western military-industrial-petroleum complexes victims, as idealized in the mind of a Socialist intellectual, -- such as the proletariat before them or even such as the trees, cows, little puffy coprophagous beetles, great white sharks, earthquakes and other lonesome bitter feminists in their 40s, in the Ecoterrorist's Whimsical World of Nature -- but that some of them, just like anywhere else on the face of this Earth are actually nothing more than a pack of unscrupulous savages who will make absolutely no distinction and kill just about anybody including, Oh My, poor poor Matthew, other Arabs.

Hence Matthew's article title that resonates like the knell of another lost illusion.

I can't tell in which closet Matthew was, before he moved into his Baghdad one, but that is not such a big surprise to me.

Learn a lesson Matthew: even the German Nazis murdered Germans. Bad guys have no ethnic preconception.

Preferences maybe, but no preconception.

That's why the Left endorses them and always supported them so much, actually. They share the same equalitarian conception of the society.

Anyway, you can see how bad Matthew from the BBCloset in Baghdad is stunned by this sudden enlightenment just by looking at the way he suddenly fall short of the lowest amount of common sense:
Since the Americans are supposedly not providing the security everybody wants, Matthew reports that "this attack has underlined one thing. It is possible to drive a vehicle, packed with explosives, up to an embassy building in Baghdad."

Astoundingly brilliant deduction Matthew.

Of course, I'm sure you noticed as well that it is also possible to fly planes into towers in New York, explosive-packed boats in US and French ships in Yemen, explosive packed vehicles in Morroco and Saudi Arabia streets, explosive-packed scumbags in Israeli buses or Muscovite theaters, explosive... Geez Matthew. The heck is your point anyway?

You should adjust your pants. Your propaganda is really showing now.

Article copy (alternate language)

Je sais qu'il faudrait plus d'une vie d'homme pour simplement répertorier les derniers 6 mois d'absolue fourberie et d'ordinaire putridité (putride ici, putride , putride ici et là) de la presse française elle-même, sans parler de la commenter, ni même de jeter un oeil plus loin, par une quelconque autre porte en Europe.

Mais parfois, le dissident frogman fait simplement "Hein ?!":
Bien sur, il est trop tôt pour faire plus que spéculer. Mais cette attaque souligne une chose. Il est possible de conduire un véhicule bourré d'explosifs, jusqu'au building d'un ambassade dans Bagdad.

Les américains disent que leur priorité numéro un est la sécurité. Les irakiens disent que leur priorité numéro un est la sécurité.

Mais jusqu'ici, nul n'y pourvoie.
Je peux comprendre que Matthew Price, correspondant de la BBC n'importe où soit surpris de découvrir que tous les arabes ne sont pas simplement une bande de joyeux individus, victimes malgré tout des grands méchants complexes militaro-industriels-pétroliers de l'Occident, tels qu'idéalisés dans l'esprit d'un intellectuel socialiste, -- comme l'a été le prolétariat avant eux ou même comme le sont les arbres, les vaches, les petits scarabées coprophages bouffis, les grands requins blancs, les tremblements de terre et autres féministes aigries et solitaires de la quarantaine, dans le Monde Merveilleux de la Nature des Ecoterroristes -- et que certains d'entre eux, comme n'importe où ailleurs sur cette Terre ne sont rien d'autre qu'une meute de sauvages sans scrupules qui ne feront absolument aucune distinction et tueront à peu près n'importe qui, y compris, Mon Dieu, Mon Dieu, pauvre Matthew, d'autres arabes.

D'où le titre de cet article de Matthew qui résonne comme le glas d'une autre illusion perdue.

Je ne saurai dire dans quel placard se trouvait Matthew, avant qu'il n'emménage dans celui qui est le sien à Bagdad, mais ça n'est pas une si grande surprise pour moi.

Apprenez une leçon Matthew: même les Nazis d'Allemagne ont assassiné des Allemands. Les vilains n'ont aucun préjugé ethnique.

Des préférences peut être, mais pas de préjugés.

C'est pourquoi la gauche les soutient et les a toujours tellement soutenus, en fait. Ils partagent la même conception égalitariste de la société.

Quoi qu'il en soit, nous pouvons juger à quel point Matthew du placard de la BBC à Bagdad est étourdi par cette soudaine illumination en remarquant comme il se trouve brusquement dépourvu de la quantité la plus élémentaire de sens commun :
Etant donné que les américains ne fournissent censément pas la sécurité que tout le monde souhaite, Matthew conclu que "cette attaque souligne une chose. Il est possible de conduire un véhicule bourré d'explosifs, jusqu'au building d'un ambassade dans Bagdad."

Sidérante déduction brillante Matthew.

Bien évidemment, je suis certain que vous n'avez pas manqué de remarquer qu'il est aussi possible de piloter des avions dans des tours à New York, des bateaux bourrés d'explosifs dans des bateaux US et français au Yémen, des véhicules bourrés d'explosifs dans des rues du Maroc et d'Arabie Saoudite, des sacs à merde bourrés d'explosifs dans des bus israéliens et des théâtres moscovites, des... Dedieu Matthew. Mais qu'est ce que vous cherchez à dire en fait ?

Vous devriez remonter votre falzar. On voit vraiment votre propagande là.

Other

About

the dissident frogman's avatar
the dissident frogman

I own, built and run this place. In a previous life I was not French but sadly, I died.

Contact

To reveal my email address, find the 2nd  number in the code and enter it in the challenge field below.

11247

The Wise knows that Cities are but demonic Soul-tearing pits that shall not be entered.

More options

Comments

Commenting as

You're presumed to have read and abide by the comments policy, but here's the gist of it:

Silly or serious, you are responsible for what you write. I slay trolls. Thank you for your comment.

Comment author avatar
Max. 300 characters
An email address is required.
It is never published or shared.

As in "valid" email address...

Once posted, your comment can't be edited. Feel free to (ab)use the Preview!

The Wise knows that Cities are but demonic Soul-tearing pits that shall not be entered.

Comments thread (5)

545 - M. Simon

Comment author avatar
Most excellent rant. Jus one minor correction from an old sailor. The Americans and French in question had ships. The Arabs had boats.

546 - the dissident frogman

Comment author avatar
  • the dissident frogman France

Edited. Thanks a lot for the technical support.
Time to take sides

547 - i am not a frog

Comment author avatar
  • i am not a frog

I agree with you that there's a flavor of propaganda in this article... However, as regards your impression that Matthew seems to discover Arab to Arab problems, I disagree: In the article, I dont' see any expression of surprise from the author (Matthew) on the fact that this is an Arab-on-Arab attack... Even the title is very factual... and does not "resonates" at all.

548 - the dissident frogman

Comment author avatar
  • the dissident frogman France

Then if that is the case, why highlighting specifically that aspect of the terror attack? Particularly considering that what defines terrorism acts is that they're intended to kill civilians blindly, without any kind of discrimination but a broadly defined target. I mean, fly a plane in a large tower in New York and you'll be sure to kill some (many) Americans. But you'll also kill some (many) people from many different ethnic backgrounds, nationality, social class and opinions. Terrorists don't care. In that respect, it's the ultimate crime against humanity and in my opinion, making a distinction based on ethnic criteria is not only irrelevant but also plain wrong. Wrong as it could be for somebody accustomed to think in terms of Third World Angelism v.s. the Evil West who's having a reality check.
Time to take sides