Dan:
Take that:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp
and that:
http://andrewsullivan.com/index.php?dish_inc=archives/2003_11_16_dish_archive.html#106904424760973924
Do you honestly believe someone would make the kind of commitment of men and materiel to battle in Iraq with nothing more than an axe to grind about on attack on daddy? What kind of logic is this?? I remind you we live in a republic, not a monarchy, and our Prez's word is not God-given holy writ. There is a system of checks and balances and they work. Have done so for a little over 200 years now. How dare you accuse "our boys" of being there without a cause! How shallow. How callous. How would you have felt, in the heat of battle, "knowing" the folks back home felt you were an idiot for being over there? More to the point, remember that it was precisely because we had the screaming LLL pull you boys out of Iraq in Gulf I that we had to return this time. You guys weren't allowed to finish the job.
I am forever grateful to those who have chosen to serve to protect us here at home. Thank you for having served; but I am appalled at your ungracious lack of support for the current troops' mission.
(And as for Quebec: there's a reason the French ditched it all those years ago. They don't want it back now either. Just ask.)
Bloggez dessus, M. Homme-Grenouille Dissident....
>:-*
-- j