So why didn't they take from their 600 best performing stores and use 1/2 their profits to fund the 600 money losing stores? That would have saved the jobs of the losing stores, while taking from the customer greedy, over-achieving money making stores. People Not Profits, remember? I think they forgot.
So why didn't they take from their 600 best performing stores and use 1/2 their profits to fund the 600 money losing stores? That would have saved the jobs of the losing stores, while taking from the customer greedy, over-achieving money making stores. People Not Profits, remember? I think they forgot.