Article copy
Brigitte Bardot, friend of the critters in the widest understanding of the term just published a book she defines as a bomb, where, alongside her interest for Mamère's buns, the woman who built her fame and wealth generously exhibiting her own behind trashes without reserve the collapsing of the ethics and values of La France®.2003 is not "69" and it looks like "coming and going between somebody else's loin" is not in Lady Brigitte's mood anymore.
Another "use but don't abuse" case, I guess.
Brigitte also misses the good old times, when "hens pecked freely and cows had a first name and answered the calls".
Let's dismiss this bucolic thrust to remind Brigitte "Marie-Antoinette" Bardot that the Mamère Gang is concerned by the hens' freedom and the dialog with the cows, as well.
That is to say officially of course, since Mamère's interest for nature is in fact equivalent to the survival chances of a one-legged hedgehog crossing a three lane highway on the first morning of the Great Summer Migration.
Let's not forget indeed that Mamère and his gang are but one of the green components in the brown, green and red alliance for which affective relations with calves, cows and pigs comes way behind attempts to individual liberties, progress and prosperity of the nations perpetrated in the name of trees and small flowers (way less capable of disappointing the persistent Leftist than the ungrateful proletariat who has the cheek to take advantage of the benefits of capitalism and liberalism and turn into middle-class as soon as you stop watching them) in their priority list.
Finally, unless her book comes as a total surprise to that respect, Brigitte Bardot, judging by these interviews, fails to convince me that when it comes to Islamism, she holds the scope, strength and insight required to receive the title of the French Oriana Fallaci.
But of course, she can still pretend to the throne of former callipygian beauty queen turned into old zoolater groupie practicing amalgam for Le Pen's National Front.
Talking about which (the
" (...) those who fundamentally believe in an ideology, whatever it is. Arlette Laguiller is respectable; her speech is sincere, just as Le Pen is (...) "That's precisely what we're reproaching them: to be liberticidal adders coiled up in the chest of our liberal democracies, patiently waiting for the opportunity to set up their totalitarian undertaking while pouring out their sinister propaganda without ever changing a single word.
We all remember Le Pen's eructations but it may be worthwhile to remind, even for the sake of comedy, this ungracious arietta of the archaic Arlette who, when pushed by a reporter - whose name I'm not remembering - who was pointing at the fact that her program for the French presidential elections in 2002 referred to a "dictatorship of the proletariat", confusedly answered that it would be indeed a "democratic dictatorship".
Stop laughing. That scored 5.72% at the first turn of the major French Republic ballot.Anyway, these interviews of BB - and most probably her "Cry in the silence" have at least one value: they confirm that she still speaks in the name of the animals, with as little depth as ever before.
As for me, if I had to choose among those of our Brigitte that are renowned for the bareness of their charms, I'd take (so to speak) this one.
She, at least, never tried to make us believe that her oral performances - pretty remarkable after all - were suitable sociological scrutinies.
Sorry but I couldn't refrain from squeezing out that succulent final alliteration in "S". Sue (SUE!) me.
Comments
Comments thread (4)
52 - Caton
Caton
53 - Chained_Duck
Chained_Duck
54 - the dissident frogman
the dissident frogman France
Je suis sûr de mon coup. J'ai posté le 13. Je sais que, contrairement au journaleux français moyen, je n'ai pas besoin de copier sur l'épaule des copains. Je sais aussi que je ne suis pas payé par le CE. D'ailleurs en y repensant, je ne suis pas payé du tout (malgré ce que certains esprits chagrins s'imaginent concernant la CIA et le Mossad) Si, comme vous l'affirmez, nous nous trouvons devant un cas de plagiat, cela me permettrait de mettre en parallèle les différences d'attitude et de déontologie entre, par exemple, le Weekly Standard et, dans le cas où vos allégations se vérifieraient, le Canard. ([url=http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/dacha/000092.html]http://www.thedissidentfrogman.com/dacha/000092.html[/url]) Voilà qui serait (presque) trop beau, surtout après avoir écrit sur la bassesse de Radio-France. Wha ha ha.
55 - minon
minon